bannerHON
img
HONnews
HONnews
img PATIENT / PARTICULIER img PROFESSIONNEL DE SANTE img WEBMESTRE img
img
 
img
HONcode sites
Khresmoi - new !
HONselect
News
Conferences
Images

Themes:
A B C D E F G H I
J K L M N O P Q
R S T U V W X Y Z
Browse archive:
2017: O S A J J M A M F J
2016: D N O

 
  Other news for:
Viruses
 Resources from HONselect
Mummy of 17th Century Child May Alter the History of Smallpox
Virus might have appeared much later than originally suspected, researchers say

By Randy Dotinga

THURSDAY, Dec. 8, 2016 (HealthDay News) -- A mummy of a child who lived in the 1600s in Lithuania could offer new insight into how smallpox developed over the millennia.

Researchers say they've found the oldest known sample of the virus that causes smallpox in the child. The child's remains were discovered in a crypt under a church, the authors report in the Dec. 8 issue of Current Biology.

"There have been signs that Egyptian mummies that are 3,000 to 4,000 years old have pockmarked scarring that have been interpreted as cases of smallpox," study first author Ana Duggan, a postdoctoral fellow at the McMaster University Ancient DNA Center in Canada, said in a journal news release.

"The new discoveries really throw those findings into question, and they suggest that the timeline of smallpox in human populations might be incorrect," Duggan said.

Researchers found the virus, known as variola, in DNA from the child's skin. Testing suggests that the strain of the virus found in the child is the same one that appeared in samples from the mid-1900s and the late 1970s.

The researchers think the samples share a viral link dating back to the years 1588-1645, when world exploration spread smallpox across the planet.

"So now that we have a timeline, we have to ask whether the earlier documented historical evidence of smallpox, which goes back to Ramses V and includes everything up to the 1500s, is real," said study co-author Hendrik Poinar. He's the director of the Ancient DNA Center at McMaster University in Canada.

"Are these indeed real cases of smallpox, or are these misidentifications, which we know is very easy to do, because it is likely possible to mistake smallpox for chicken pox and measles," he said.

Another member of the research team put it this way.

"Now we know all the evolution of the sampled strains dates from 1650, but we still don't know when smallpox first appeared in humans, and we don't know what animal it came from, and we don't know that because we don't have any older historical samples to work with," said study co-author Edward Holmes, a professor at the University of Sydney in Australia. "So this does put a new perspective on this very important disease."

More information

For more about smallpox, try the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

SOURCE: Cell Press, news release, Dec. 8, 2016

Copyright © 2016 HealthDay. All rights reserved. URL:http://consumer.healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=717461

Resources from HONselect: HONselect is the HON's medical search engine. It retrieves scientific articles, images, conferences and web sites on the selected subject.
Smallpox
Research Personnel
DNA
Back
Sprains and Strains
The list of medical terms above are retrieved automatically from the article.

Disclaimer: The text presented on this page is not a substitute for professional medical advice. It is for your information only and may not represent your true individual medical situation. Do not hesitate to consult your healthcare provider if you have any questions or concerns. Do not use this information to diagnose or treat a health problem or disease without consulting a qualified healthcare professional.
Be advised that HealthDay articles are derived from various sources and may not reflect your own country regulations. The Health On the Net Foundation does not endorse opinions, products, or services that may appear in HealthDay articles.


Home img About us img MediaCorner img HON newsletter img Site map img Ethical policies img Contact