bannerHON
img
HONnews
HONnews
img PATIENT / PARTICULIER img PROFESSIONNEL DE SANTE img WEBMESTRE img
img
 
img
HONcode sites
All Web sites
HONselect
News
Conferences
Images

Themes:
A B C D E F G H I
J K L M N O P Q
R S T U V W X Y Z
Browse archive:
2014: A M F J
2013: D N O S A J J M A

 
  Other news for:
Tendon Injuries
Technology, Medical
Surgery
 Resources from HONselect
Some Hip-Replacement Parts Not Proven Safe or Effective: Study
About 8 percent of components used in Britain not backed by evidence; Harvard researchers call for stricter controls

By Robert Preidt

FRIDAY, Dec. 20, 2013 (HealthDay News) -- There's no evidence to support the safety or effectiveness of nearly 8 percent of all components used in hip-replacement surgeries in England and Wales, a new study finds.

The University of Oxford researchers said the current regulatory process "seems to be entirely inadequate" and called for a new system for introducing new devices.

The team's review of data revealed that more than 10,000 of the nearly 137,000 components used in primary hip replacements in England and Wales in 2011 had no solid evidence of being effective.

These components included about 150 cemented stems, more than 900 uncemented stems, more than 1,700 cemented cups and nearly 7,600 uncemented cups, according to the study, which was published online Dec. 19 in the journal BMJ.

In a journal news release, researcher Sion Glyn-Jones and colleagues said their findings are of great concern, "particularly in light of the widespread publicity surrounding recent safety problems with regard to some resurfacing and other large-diameter metal-on-metal joint replacements."

The researchers said their results likely underestimate the actual extent of the problem.

"This study shows that the need still exists for an improved and more rigorous approach to regulation of devices to avoid devices with no available evidence being used in a widespread and uncontrolled manner," the study authors said.

Tighter controls are needed, Aaron Kesselheim and Jerry Avorn, of Harvard Medical School, said in an accompanying journal editorial.

Doctors who use new devices that "have little or no evidence of superiority over existing products need to be educated about the implications of their choices," Kesselheim and Avorn said. "They should also ensure that their patients know about the benefits and risks of the new -- but often unproved -- medical devices they are receiving."

More information

The U.S. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases has more about hip replacements.

SOURCE: BMJ, news release, Dec. 19, 2013

Copyright © 2013 HealthDay. All rights reserved. URL:http://consumer.healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=683151

Resources from HONselect: HONselect is the HON's medical search engine. It retrieves scientific articles, images, conferences and web sites on the selected subject.
Equipment and Supplies
Research Personnel
Wounds and Injuries
Joints
The list of medical terms above are retrieved automatically from the article.

Disclaimer: The text presented on this page is not a substitute for professional medical advice. It is for your information only and may not represent your true individual medical situation. Do not hesitate to consult your healthcare provider if you have any questions or concerns. Do not use this information to diagnose or treat a health problem or disease without consulting a qualified healthcare professional.
Be advised that HealthDay articles are derived from various sources and may not reflect your own country regulations. The Health On the Net Foundation does not endorse opinions, products, or services that may appear in HealthDay articles.


Home img About us img MediaCorner img HON newsletter img Site map img Ethical policies img Contact